Understanding the Question

When an interviewer asks, "Can you discuss a significant finding from your research or professional experience that was counterintuitive or surprising?", they are probing not just for a recount of an unexpected result, but also for an insight into your analytical and problem-solving skills. This question allows you to showcase your ability to navigate complex data, adapt to new information, and your capacity for critical thinking. For a Biostatistician, whose role often involves sifting through vast amounts of data to find patterns, correlations, or anomalies that can inform medical and public health decisions, the ability to discern and interpret surprising findings is crucial.

Interviewer's Goals

The interviewer is looking to understand several key aspects of your professional character and expertise:

1. Analytical Skills: How you approach data that does not fit initial hypotheses or expectations.
2. Adaptability: Your ability to pivot based on new, unexpected information.
3. Critical Thinking: How you differentiate between mere anomalies and significant findings that could indicate a need for a change in understanding or approach.
4. Communication: Your ability to clearly and effectively communicate complex statistical findings to a non-expert audience.
5. Professional Maturity: How you handle surprises or challenges in your research, including any steps you took to verify or further explore the finding.

How to Approach Your Answer

Your response should be structured in a way that clearly outlines the situation, your actions, and the outcome or implications of the finding. Here’s how you can approach your answer:

1. Briefly outline the project or research context: Start by giving a short overview of what the project or research was about, including the initial hypothesis or goal.

2. Describe the surprising finding: Clearly state what the finding was and why it was unexpected. This helps set the stage for discussing your response to it.

3. Explain your analysis and validation process: Detail the steps you took to analyze the finding further. This could include additional tests, consulting with colleagues, or reviewing literature to see if similar findings were reported elsewhere.

   Use Our Voice AI to Practice Your Response

4. Discuss the implications: Talk about what the finding meant for your project or field. Did it lead to a new understanding, change in direction, or novel approach?

5. Reflect on the experience: Conclude by reflecting on what you learned from the experience and how it has informed your approach to biostatistics since then.

Example Responses Relevant to Biostatistician

Example 1: "In a project aimed at identifying risk factors for type 2 diabetes, a counterintuitive finding was that a certain demographic group traditionally considered at lower risk showed significantly higher prevalence rates than expected. Initially, I rechecked our data and statistical models for errors. After confirming the accuracy of our findings, I conducted a deeper dive into the data and consulted interdisciplinary literature which suggested potential socio-economic and genetic factors that were previously underexplored. This led to a broader study, incorporating these new variables, which not only confirmed our findings but also opened up a new avenue of research into diabetes risk factors. This experience underscored the importance of being open to unexpected results and the potential they have to challenge and expand current understandings."

Example 2: "During a clinical trial I was analyzing, we observed that patients receiving the placebo were reporting improvements at a rate almost as high as those receiving the actual medication. This was surprising and initially thought to be an error. However, further analysis suggested a strong placebo effect, influenced by participants' perceptions of treatment. This finding led us to adjust our analysis of the medication's efficacy, taking into account the psychological aspects of treatment. It was a profound lesson in the complexity of human health and the importance of considering psychological factors in clinical research."

Tips for Success

• Be Specific: Provide enough detail to give the interviewer a clear picture of the scenario without getting lost in technicalities.
• Show Enthusiasm: Let your interest and enthusiasm for uncovering and understanding surprising findings shine through.
• Be Honest: If you haven't encountered a surprising finding, it's better to discuss how you would handle such a scenario rather than fabricate an experience.
• Reflect on Learning: Highlight what the experience taught you and how it has influenced your approach to biostatistical analysis.
• Practice Your Delivery: Ensure your response is coherent and concise by practicing it beforehand, ideally with someone who can provide feedback.

Answering this question effectively allows you to demonstrate your expertise as a Biostatistician, showcasing not only your technical skills but also your critical thinking, adaptability, and communication skills, all of which are crucial for success in this field.